Amnesty International on Friday accused international oil majors Shell and Eni of negligence when addressing spills in Nigeria.
Describing their actions as “serious negligence”, Amnesty said the companies were “taking weeks to respond to reports of spills and publishing misleading information about the cause and severity of spills, which may result in communities not receiving compensation”.
A Shell spokesman said Amnesty’s allegations “are false, without merit and fail to recognise the complex environment in which the company operates”.
ENI declined immediate comment.
Shell and Eni have for decades been two of the most active oil majors operating in the Niger Delta region.
Read More
Nigeria's President Buhari To Visit Taraba, Benue and Three Others State
US Rapper French Montana’s Health Center Helps 300K People in Uganda
Zambians Are Having A Serious ‘Rights vs Morals’ Debate Over Sex Dolls
Nigeria’s crude-producing heartland is an ecological disaster zone, scarred by decades of spills that have killed trees and other plants.
Yet clean-ups, and the associated compensation, are highly contentious, with some local communities even blocking teams’ access to spill sites, allowing the damage to worsen, in the hope of extracting a bigger pay-out.
Under Nigerian law, companies must visit sites within 24 hours of reporting a spill. Amnesty said that in one case Italian Eni took more than a year to respond to a spill in Bayelsa state.
While companies frequently attribute spills to vandalism, locals say they are often due to other issues such as corrosion.
Shell has reported 1,010 spills since 2011, and Eni 820 since 2014, according to Amnesty International. But Amnesty says among those 1,830 reports, 89 had “reasonable doubts" surrounding the causes provided by the oil companies.
In 2015, the Bodo community and a British law firm negotiated a £55 million pollution settlement with Shell.
The Natural Resource Governance Institute, a non-profit group that advises countries on how to manage oil, gas and mineral resources, acknowledged there were sometimes difficulties on both sides.
“There’s no good guy here, everybody’s kind of bad. I’m sure the companies don’t do all that they can to get to these places. But then they also have genuine grievances and genuine difficulties dealing with these communities,” said Aaron Sayne, from the institute.
“When spills become an opportunity to make money, your clean-up becomes really tough.”
REUTERS
Describing their actions as “serious negligence”, Amnesty said the companies were “taking weeks to respond to reports of spills and publishing misleading information about the cause and severity of spills, which may result in communities not receiving compensation”.
A Shell spokesman said Amnesty’s allegations “are false, without merit and fail to recognise the complex environment in which the company operates”.
There’s no good guy here, everybody’s kind of bad. I’m sure the companies don’t do all that they can to get to these places. But then they also have genuine grievances and genuine difficulties dealing with these communities
ENI declined immediate comment.
Shell and Eni have for decades been two of the most active oil majors operating in the Niger Delta region.
Read More
Nigeria's President Buhari To Visit Taraba, Benue and Three Others State
US Rapper French Montana’s Health Center Helps 300K People in Uganda
Zambians Are Having A Serious ‘Rights vs Morals’ Debate Over Sex Dolls
Nigeria’s crude-producing heartland is an ecological disaster zone, scarred by decades of spills that have killed trees and other plants.
Yet clean-ups, and the associated compensation, are highly contentious, with some local communities even blocking teams’ access to spill sites, allowing the damage to worsen, in the hope of extracting a bigger pay-out.
Under Nigerian law, companies must visit sites within 24 hours of reporting a spill. Amnesty said that in one case Italian Eni took more than a year to respond to a spill in Bayelsa state.
While companies frequently attribute spills to vandalism, locals say they are often due to other issues such as corrosion.
Shell has reported 1,010 spills since 2011, and Eni 820 since 2014, according to Amnesty International. But Amnesty says among those 1,830 reports, 89 had “reasonable doubts" surrounding the causes provided by the oil companies.
In 2015, the Bodo community and a British law firm negotiated a £55 million pollution settlement with Shell.
The Natural Resource Governance Institute, a non-profit group that advises countries on how to manage oil, gas and mineral resources, acknowledged there were sometimes difficulties on both sides.
“There’s no good guy here, everybody’s kind of bad. I’m sure the companies don’t do all that they can to get to these places. But then they also have genuine grievances and genuine difficulties dealing with these communities,” said Aaron Sayne, from the institute.
“When spills become an opportunity to make money, your clean-up becomes really tough.”
REUTERS
1 komentar:
[…] major, Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) has earmarked about $15 billion for investments in Nigeria’s oil and gas industry. The outlay […]
ReplyShare your thoughts with me...
EmoticonEmoticon